How can we explain a proliferation of alliances when the probability of failure is higher than success? And why have we emphasized their order, manageability and predictability whilst acknowledging that they tend to be experienced as messy, politically charged and unpredictable? Mark de Rond, in this provocative book, sets out to address such paradoxes. Based on in-depth case studies of three major biotechnology alliances, he suggests that we need theories to explain idiosyncracy as well as social order. He argues that such theories must allow for social conduct to be active and self-directed but simultaneously inert and constrained, thus permitting voluntarism, determinism, and serendipity alike to explain causation in alliance life. The book offers a highly original combination of insights from social theory and intellectual history with more mainstream strategic management and organizations literature. It is a refreshing and thought-provoking analysis that will appeal to practitioner and academic researcher alike.
Foreword A. Huff; Preface: By way of introduction; 1. Paradoxes of alliance life; 2. The context of drug discovery; 3. Case study 1: Rummidgen and plethora; 4. Case study 2: Cambiogen and plethora; 5. Case study 3: Bionatura and pflegum-courtal; 6. Putting two and two together: Revisiting theory and practice; 7. Strategy, structure, and structuration: The general in the particular; 8. The hedgehog and the fox: The particular in the general; 9. The legitimacy of messiness; Appendix: A few words on methodology
(0 Comentarios)
